A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme on Knowledge regarding Tracheostomy Care among 2nd year GNM Students of selected Nursing Schools at Bangalore
Asha Sajji1*, Angel K Jose2, Arpita Paul2, H. Tika Devi Sharma2, Midhun Jose2,
Sairoj Thapa2, Soorya Kiran. S.2
1Ph.D. (N), Professor, Department of Medical Surgical Nursing,
Raja Rajeswari College of Nursing, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
2B. Sc. (N) students, Raja Rajeswari College of Nursing, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: ashasajji@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Background of the study: Tracheostomy is a surgical procedure of making an incision into the trachea so that a tube can be inserted into the opening to assist breathing for the patient requiring respiratory support. Tracheostomy care includes a multidisciplinary approach, mainly involving nursing care. Good tracheostomy care consists of consistent suctioning, stoma care, nutrition, speech therapy, and periodic changing of the tracheostomy tube.5 Objectives: To assess pre-test and post test knowledge regarding tracheostomy care among student nurses. 2. To evaluate the effectiveness of structured teaching programme on knowledge regarding tracheostomy care among student nurses. 3. To find out the association between post-test knowledge scores regarding tracheostomy care among student nurses with their selected demographic variables. Design: Pre-experimental one group pre test post test design was selected for the study. Fifty 2 nd year GNM students were selected through non-probability convenience sampling technique. Data was collected using a self-structured knowledge questionnaire. Results: Findings revealed that, in pre-test, 33(66%) participants had inadequate knowledge, 16(32%) had moderately adequate knowledge and only 1(2%) had adequate knowledge. In post test, 30(60%) participants had adequate knowledge and 20(40%) had moderately adequate knowledge. The mean score of post-test knowledge 20.7±2.697 was higher than mean score of pre-test knowledge 11.12± 5.149. The calculated t-value 11.65 was found to be significant at p<0.05 level. Conclusion: Teaching programmes are effective in enhancing the knowledge regarding tracheostomy care and hence must be conducted at regular intervals.
KEYWORDS: Structured teaching programme, Knowledge, Tracheostomy care.
INTRODUCTION:
Tracheostomy is a surgical procedure commonly performed in intensive care units. It involves making an incision into the trachea so that a tube can be inserted into the opening to assist breathing for the patient requiring respiratory support.1
It can be performed as emergency or elective procedure.2 Traditionally it was confined to emergency management of upper airway obstruction but now more recently indications have extended to include prolonged mechanical ventilation, chronic respiratory insufficiency, and management of excessive secretions.1 Alexander the Great, legend has it, performed a surgical tracheostomy in the fourth century BCE, using the tip of his sword to open the windpipe of a choking soldier.2
Tracheostomy is performed to bypass upper airway obstruction. 10– 24% of patients in ICU require tracheostomy for prolonged respiratory support or weaning. Critically ill patients tolerate short-term tracheal intubation with few complications where as prolonged tracheal intubation is associated with major complications. Tracheostomy is also considered in patients predicted to require prolonged artificial clearance to minimize or avoid laryngeal injury secondary to an extended period of translaryngeal intubation. This can also avoid the undesirable side-effects of ongoing sedation allowing for increased patient comfort, cough, respiratory drive, mobility and gut function.3
The complications of tracheostomy can be either early or late. The early complications include hemorrhage, tube dislodgement, pneumothorax, and wound infection, while late complications include tracheal stenosis, tracheo-esophageal fistula and laryngeal stenosis.4 Care of tracheostomy includes a multidisciplinary approach, mainly involving nursing care. Good tracheostomy care consists of consistent suctioning, stoma care, nutrition, speech therapy, and periodic changing of the tracheostomy tube.5
While providing tracheostomy care, the nurse must ensure that the tube is free of secretions, maintain a patent airway, provide wound care, assess the patient, and secure tracheostomy tubes in place. Decannulation may occure due to the movement of tube that may cause irritation and coughing. Keeping the tube secure while changing the ties or holder to prevent accidental decannulation is critical.6
The patient with new tracheostomy will face many problems like management of excess secretions, risk of infections, body image disturbances and impaired vocalization. Health care providers must ensure the patient safety while they are moved from hospital to home. Patient and the family must understand all the aspects of tracheostomy care. They should be able to recognize any signs and symptoms of infection or tube displacement that should be reported to the physician and have adequate support at home. Nurses can help a patient successfully manage these problems through comprehensive discharge planning.7
OBJECTIVES:
Objectives of the study were as follows:
1. To assess pre-test and post test knowledge regarding tracheostomy care among student nurses.
2. To evaluate the effectiveness of structured teaching programme on knowledge regarding tracheostomy care among student nurses.
3. To find out the association between post-test knowledge scores regarding tracheostomy care among student nurses with their selected demographic variables.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Current study was conducted using a pre-experimental one group pre-test post-test design. 50 2nd year GNM students were selected by non-probability convenience sampling technique. A pre tested structured knowledge questionnaire consisting 30 items was used to collect data. Validity of the tool was established under the expert guidance from medical surgical nursing. Reliability of the tool was established using test- retest method and feasibility was checked by conducting a pilot study. Informed consent from the study participants and also institutional ethical clearance from the concerned authority was obtained before proceeding for data collection. Descriptive and inferential statistics was used to analyze the data.
RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION:
Table 1: Frequency and percentage distribution of subjects according their Socio-demographic variables n=50
Variables |
Frequency |
Percentage (%) |
Age in years |
||
18-19 |
16 |
32 |
20-21 |
24 |
48 |
22-23 |
9 |
18 |
24 & above |
1 |
2 |
Gender |
||
Male |
12 |
24 |
Female |
38 |
76 |
Religion |
||
Hindu |
42 |
84 |
Muslim |
0 |
0 |
Christian |
8 |
16 |
Others |
0 |
0 |
Duration of clinical posting in ICU/CCU |
||
<1 Month |
9 |
18 |
>1 Month |
11 |
22 |
Never posted |
30 |
60 |
Source of information |
||
Internet |
18 |
36 |
Books |
28 |
56 |
News paper |
0 |
0 |
Others |
4 |
8 |
Table 1 depicts the socio-demographic characteristics of student nurses. Majority of the subjects, 24(48%) were in the age group of 20-21 years, 38(76%) were females, 42(84%) belonged to Hindu community, 30(60%) subjects never had clinical posting in ICU/CCU and 28(56%) gained information from books.
Graph 1: Comparison of level of knowledge between pre test and post test n=50
Graph 1 shows the comparison of level of knowledge between pre test and post test. In pre test, 33(66%) subjects had inadequate knowledge, 16(32%) had moderately adequate knowledge and only 1(2%) had adequate knowledge. In post test, 30(60%) subjects had adequate knowledge, 20(40%) had moderately adequate knowledge and no one had inadequate knowledge.
Table 2: Comparison of Pre-test and Post-test Knowledge Score regarding Tracheostomy Care n=50
Knowledge Score |
Mean |
SD |
t- value |
p- value |
Pre-test knowledge score |
11.12 |
5.149 |
11.65* |
0.00001 |
Post-test knowledge score |
20.7 |
2.697 |
*Significant at p<0.05, df=49
Table 2 depicts the comparison of pre-test and post-test knowledge scores regarding tracheostomy care among student nurses. Data reveals that the mean score of post-test knowledge 20.7±2.697 was higher than mean score of pre-test knowledge 11.12±5.149. The calculated t-value 11.65 is significant at p<0.05 level.
Table 3: Factors associated with knowledge of student nurses regarding tracheostomy care with demographic variables n=50
Variables |
No. of subjects |
Post test score |
Chi- square & p-value |
||
≤14 |
15-19 |
≥20 |
|||
Age |
|||||
17-18 |
16 |
0 |
4 |
12 |
2.2444, 0.52326, df=3, NS |
18-19 |
24 |
0 |
11 |
13 |
|
19-20 |
9 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
|
>20 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Gender |
|||||
Male |
12 |
0 |
10 |
2 |
12.3538, 0.00044, df=1, S |
Female |
38 |
0 |
10 |
28 |
|
Religion |
|||||
Hindu |
42 |
0 |
15 |
27 |
2.0089, 0.15638, df=3, NS |
Muslim |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Christian |
8 |
0 |
5 |
3 |
|
Others |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Duration of clinical posting in ICU/CCU |
|||||
<1 Month |
9 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
1.4646, 0.480791, df=2, NS |
>1 Month |
11 |
0 |
3 |
8 |
|
Never |
30 |
0 |
14 |
16 |
|
Source of information |
|||||
Internet |
18 |
0 |
8 |
10 |
0.5291, 0.767551, df-3, NS |
Books |
28 |
0 |
10 |
18 |
|
Newspaper |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Others |
4 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
S-Significant at p<0.05, NS- Not significant at p<0.05
Table 3: depicts that there is a significant association of knowledge with gender and no association was found with age, religion, duration of clinical posting in ICU/CCU and source of information.
DISCUSSION:
Findings of the current study shows that, 24(48%) subjects were in the age group of 20-21 years and majority 38(76%) being females. These findings were consistent with the findings reported by Kaur K. who used the same sample size and found that 70% participants in the study were between 21-25 years age group and 96% participants were females.1 Similarly a study conducted by Shiyamala P., et al reported that 90% of the subjects in their study were females.10 42(84%) participants in this study belonged to Hindu community which were similar to the findings a study carried out by Kanakalmath, R. C., et al, where the authors stated that majority of the participants were hindus.8 30(60%) subjects in this study never had clinical posting in ICU/CCU. Similarly, according to the findings reported by Kanakalmath, R. C., et al, 88% subjects did not have earlier exposure to tracheostomy care.8 In present study it was found that 28(56%) gained information from books which was consistent with findings of a study conducted by Kaur K. stating 70% subjects gained information from books.1 68% subjects gained information from books and journals according a study conducted by Kanakalmath, R. C., et al.8
2. Trubuhovich. R. V. Primary sources and the tracheostomy legend about Alexander the Great. J Anesth Hist. 2018; 4: 38.
5. Berman, A., and Snyder, S. Fundamentals of nursing concepts, Process and practice. Company of John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. 2012; 9th ed. 1604-16010.
6. Ignatavicius, D.D., Workman, M. LRebar, C. R., & Heimgartner, N. M. Medical- surgical nursing concept of interprofessional collaborative care. Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 2020; 9th ed. 576.
7. Wilson. E. B., Malley. N. Discharge planning for the patient with a new tracheostomy. Crit Care Nurse. 1990; 10: 73-9
8. Kanakalmath. R. C., Pinnapati. S. S., Patali. C. S., Ronad. S. K. A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Planned Teaching Programme on Knowledge Regarding Tracheostomy Care Among Final Year GNM Students in Selected Schools of Nursing at Bagalkot, Karnataka. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology. 2018; 3(11): 129-137.
9. Dhaliwal. M. K., Choudhary. R., Sharma. P. A Descriptive Study to assess the knowledge and skills on tracheostomy care among staff nurses working in selected hospitals of district Mohali, Punjab. Asian Journal of Nursing Education and Research. 2018; 8(2): 242-246.
10. Shiyamala. P., Suseelal. T., Kanniammal. C. Effect of IEC package regarding knowledge on tracheostomy care among undergraduate students in SRM college of nursing, Kattankulathur, Chengalpet district. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results. 2022; 13(9): 1927-1929.
Received on 16.09.2023 Modified on 07.11.2023
Accepted on 17.01.2024 © A&V Publications all right reserved
Int. J. Nur. Edu. and Research. 2024; 12(1):11-14.
DOI: 10.52711/2454-2660.2024.00003